[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure
From: |
Gaius Mulley |
Subject: |
Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Aug 2019 19:32:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
john o goyo <address@hidden> writes:
> On 07/26/19 18:34, Gaius Mulley wrote (in part):
>> john o goyo <address@hidden> writes (in part):
>>> Indeed it has, Gaius, and back to the old ShiftLeft problem, which I
>>> will track one in due course.
>> Hi John,
>>
>> thanks for the reminder - I think adding extra regression tests to slice
>> up ShiftLeft would be interesting - hopefully will have a few written in
>> the next few days,
>
> Thank you, Gaius, that would be much appreciated. The fact is, I
> quite ignorant of the inner workings of gcc. Hunting down the problem
> would take me an enormous amount of time.
Hi John,
I've written 34 extra tests programs which are now part of the
testsuite. (testsuite/gm2/sets/run/pass/*.mod). It would be
interesting to know if they misbehave on your machine. They test single
word set operators and also double word sets.
Checked into gcc-trunk at present,
regards,
Gaius
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure,
Gaius Mulley <=
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/10
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/10
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/12
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/12