[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure
From: |
Gaius Mulley |
Subject: |
Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Aug 2019 17:27:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
john o goyo <address@hidden> writes:
> On 08/02/19 15:39, Gaius Mulley wrote (in part):
>>
>>> and now backported to gcc-9.1.0
>> Hi John, I think they have just shown a problem in multisets - at
>> least this is what I see on the x86_64. I've just seen it and not
>> yet investigated but it could be useful,
>> gm2/sets/run/pass/multisetrotate3.mod fails currently,
>
> Gaius,
>
> May I ask you to put a combined tarball on floppsie when you have time?
>
> Thank you.
> john
Hi John,
all done - I've also checked in some improved tests and also fixed a bug
in SYSTEM.mod (RotateVal). Which now uses modulus setsize to skip
excessive rotate right hand operand values.
wget http://floppsie.comp.glam.ac.uk/download/c/gcc-9.1.0+gm2-20190805.tar.gz
regards,
Gaius
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure,
Gaius Mulley <=
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/10
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/10
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/12
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/12