[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure
From: |
Gaius Mulley |
Subject: |
Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Aug 2019 20:39:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Gaius Mulley <address@hidden> writes:
> Gaius Mulley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> john o goyo <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> On 07/26/19 18:34, Gaius Mulley wrote (in part):
>>>> john o goyo <address@hidden> writes (in part):
>>>>> Indeed it has, Gaius, and back to the old ShiftLeft problem, which I
>>>>> will track one in due course.
>>>> Hi John,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the reminder - I think adding extra regression tests to slice
>>>> up ShiftLeft would be interesting - hopefully will have a few written in
>>>> the next few days,
>>>
>>> Thank you, Gaius, that would be much appreciated. The fact is, I
>>> quite ignorant of the inner workings of gcc. Hunting down the problem
>>> would take me an enormous amount of time.
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I've written 34 extra tests programs which are now part of the
>> testsuite. (testsuite/gm2/sets/run/pass/*.mod). It would be
>> interesting to know if they misbehave on your machine. They test single
>> word set operators and also double word sets.
>>
>> Checked into gcc-trunk at present,
>
> and now backported to gcc-9.1.0
Hi John,
I think they have just shown a problem in multisets - at least this is
what I see on the x86_64. I've just seen it and not yet investigated
but it could be useful,
gm2/sets/run/pass/multisetrotate3.mod fails currently,
regards,
Gaius
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure,
Gaius Mulley <=
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/02
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/05
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/10
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/10
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, Gaius Mulley, 2019/08/12
- Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure, john o goyo, 2019/08/12