Re: [Gm2] gm2-20190709 on gcc-9.1.0 build failure

[john o goyo]

On 08/02/19 15:39, Gaius Mulley wrote:
> Gaius Mulley <address@hidden> writes:
> > Gaius Mulley <address@hidden> writes:
> > > john o goyo <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > On 07/26/19 18:34, Gaius Mulley wrote (in part):
> > > > > john o goyo <address@hidden> writes (in part):
> > > > > > Indeed it has, Gaius, and back to the old ShiftLeft problem, 
> > > > > > which I will track one in due course. 
> > > > > Hi John, thanks for the reminder - I think adding extra regression 
> > > > > tests to slice up ShiftLeft would be interesting - hopefully will 
> > > > > have a few written in the next few days, 
> > > > Thank you, Gaius, that would be much appreciated. The fact is, I 
> > > > quite ignorant of the inner workings of gcc. Hunting down the 
> > > > problem would take me an enormous amount of time. 
> > > Hi John, I've written 34 extra tests programs which are now part of 
> > > the testsuite. (testsuite/gm2/sets/run/pass/*.mod). It would be 
> > > interesting to know if they misbehave on your machine. They test 
> > > single word set operators and also double word sets. Checked into 
> > > gcc-trunk at present, 
> > and now backported to gcc-9.1.0 
> Hi John, I think they have just shown a problem in multisets - at 
> least this is what I see on the x86_64. I've just seen it and not yet 
> investigated but it could be useful, 
> gm2/sets/run/pass/multisetrotate3.mod fails currently,

I will try it tonight, Gaius, (I am in EDT) and thank you for the tests.

Sincerely,
john