autoconf-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bootstrapping from cvs


From: Jim Meyering
Subject: Re: Bootstrapping from cvs
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:31:59 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

> It could be named "autoreconf --touch".
>
> Jim> Sure, it's hard to do these things right, but we (of all people!)
> Jim> should do our best to set a good example.
>
> I don't think there is a right or wrong here.

:-)
Ok.  I'll rephrase.
Sometimes it's hard to avoid give the user (post-configure)
access to all build rules, but it is a worthy goal.

I admit that it is a fine point -- and mainly one of aesthetics.
In practice it usually doesn't make a difference.

> I've worked on projects with maintainer-mode and those without.
> Generally speaking I haven't found any significant problems in either
> situation.  With the sole exception of autoconf.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]