[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile
From: |
Jeff Barlow |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Nov 2002 15:13:58 -0800 |
"E. Weddington" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>Somehow I get the feeling that it's not a case of morons hacking at a
>tool. It feels like two things:
>1. A business "partnership" (conspiracy) between Atmel and IAR. And
>they are not going to let another tool get between them.
>2. Economy. I'm sure Atmel is going to spend time and money on their
>core business of electronic devices and not spending time and money
>on "peripheral" things like software tools. Which this could be the
>reason why number 1 above is happening.
>
>Again, these are just educated guesses.
Do we even know that Atmel is doing this work in house? Maybe they've
outsourced it from someone else, like IAR, perhaps.
Later,
Jeff
avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org
- [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile, Daniel Williamson, 2002/11/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile, E. Weddington, 2002/11/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile, Marko Panger, 2002/11/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile, E. Weddington, 2002/11/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile, Jesper Hansen, 2002/11/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile, E. Weddington, 2002/11/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile,
Jeff Barlow <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile, Larry Barello, 2002/11/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile, E. Weddington, 2002/11/09
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile, address@hidden, 2002/11/09
Fw: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Elf - coff volatile, Marko Panger, 2002/11/09