RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer

[John Regehr]

On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Weddington, Eric wrote:
> Unfortunately diablo looks a bit stale. Their latest release was over 3 
> years ago (Feb. 2006), and their required patches are for binutils 2.13 
> and gcc 3.3.2. :-P
>
> Is this project even a going concern anymore?

I don't think so.  And anyway I think doing LTO in the compiler is a 
better idea-- more information is available.  But the Diablo papers are 
useful and informative and give some ideas about what degree of 
improvement is obtainable using this sort of approach.

John