[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:42:45 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of David Brown
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:36 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer
>
> I really don't know the status of LLVM and how well it would
> work for a
> small device like the AVR - but it would be *very*
> interesting to find
> out! There are a lot of small microcontrollers with limited
> or no open
> source compilers, most of which are poorly suited to gcc
> ports. Maybe
> they are equally unsuitable for LLVM ports - but maybe not. The only
> way to know for sure is for someone to work on such a port
> and see how
> it goes. That sounds like a great student project to me!
Oh, you're certainly preaching to the choir. I understand the potential
benefits of such a thing.
It's the "sponsor" part that may not fly right now.
- [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, Sean D'Epagnier, 2009/04/19
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, John Regehr, 2009/04/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, John Regehr, 2009/04/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/20
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer, David Brown, 2009/04/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/20
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer, David Brown, 2009/04/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, Josef Eisl, 2009/04/20
RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/20
Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, John Regehr, 2009/04/20
Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, Georg-Johann Lay, 2009/04/20