[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation
From: |
Daishi Kato |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:52:41 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/21.4 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:46:54 -0500,
John Cowan wrote:
> I'd rather see units and eggs treated as on a par, and the distinction
> drawn between community-supported, author-supported, and unsupported
> packages.
This might work, but isn't it hard to say something is community-supported?
How about "Development Status" in sourceforge.net?
--daishi
- Re: [Chicken-users] Comprehensive documentation rewrite, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Ozzi, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Peter Bex, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Ozzi, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Ivan Raikov, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, John Cowan, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Ivan Raikov, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, felix winkelmann, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, john, 2008/02/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation,
Daishi Kato <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, John Cowan, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Elf, 2008/02/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2008/02/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, felix winkelmann, 2008/02/13
Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation, Elf, 2008/02/12