[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath future?
From: |
Jeff Sturm |
Subject: |
Re: Classpath future? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:53:08 -0400 (EDT) |
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Etienne M. Gagnon wrote:
> But there's still the problem that patches aren't getting in the CVS
> tree because of the Copyright assignment issue (some people legitimately
> don't want to assign Copyright, others are caught up in a slow process).
Out of curiousity, what would you contribute that you wouldn't want to
assign? There should be a clear boundary between Classpath and your
SableVM project. Code for the former should benefit any VM project.
Besides, many contributions amend existing sources that already have
copyright assignment.
> I have many months ago sent a few patches on this list. These were
> probably small enough not to require paperwork, but nothing happened.
Now that's a different problem. You should receive feedback one way or
the other. I'm not a maintainer so I can't say what's going on with any
authority.
This reminds me vaguely of the EGCS/GCC split years ago...
Jeff
- Re: Classpath future?, (continued)
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?,
Jeff Sturm <=
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Brian Jones, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Brian Jones, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Stuart Ballard, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, John Keiser, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12