Re: [Denemo-devel] make dist failing

[Richard Shann]

On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 10:33 -0400, Paul Brossier wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On 29/01/2014 05:51, Richard Shann wrote:
> > I was forgetting about this libaubio problem when I suggested we 
> > create the release. Unfortunately, I am at a loss to say how we 
> > should proceed - there is no response so far on the aubio site. We 
> > could treat it as libsmf, so that we have our own copy of the aubio 
> > code (we only need to build the library) for use where the external 
> > version is unavailable. Or we could bracket the aubio-specific parts 
> > of Denemo with #ifdef _HAVE_AUBIO_ (this would mean no microphone 
> > input and no opening audio tracks for transcription).
> 
> Sorry I did not document the API changes. I will submit a patch soon to
> update denemo to aubio 0.4.0.

That would be great - thank you very much
> 
> > Incidentally, I read that the new aubio version, besides a change of 
> > API uses the "waf" build system instead of autotools, which is 
> > apparently causing problems of its own.
> 
> Please let me know any problem it may cause.

What I read was on the Debian site; my immediate problem was that "waf"
yielded no hits when I looked for a package to install on my (Debian
stable) distro. So I guessed I couldn't build the new aubio. But this
may just be my misunderstanding of what's involved.

Incidentally, I couldn't navigate to the aubio mailing list
https://lists.aubio.org/ (I got an "Untrusted Website" page, with no way
forward), hence the message I left on the announcement page.

Thanks for the prompt reply - glad to hear about the development. It'll
be interesting to see how the new code works with that demo of the note
onset detection https://vimeo.com/82292569)

Richard


> 
> Best, Paul
> 
> 
> > 
> > Richard
> > 
> > On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 12:12 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 15:10 +0100, Federico Bruni wrote:
> >>> 2014/1/19 Andreas Schneider <address@hidden> If you don't 
> >>> use that old version of Denemo shipping with the distribution, 
> >>> you could remove that package and libaubio2 with it.
> >>> libaubio-dev contains the development files needed to compile
> >>> Denemo, and it's version 0.4.0 as it depends on libaubio4. That
> >>> also means
> >> 
> >> ??? I am looking at aubio version 0.4.0 on its website - it says
> >> it was released on 17th December, i.e. brand-new. It uses a new
> >> API, which Denemo does not support yet. I have asked on the aubio
> >> forum if any guidance for upgrading could be given, but now I am
> >> having difficulties navigating the aubio site :( so I don't know if
> >> there is any response.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> that libaubio4 is the one Denemo gets compiled with.
> >>> 
> >>> unfortunately, ardour3 depends on libaubio2, so I cannot remove 
> >>> it
> >> 
> >> I have also had a dig around on the ardour site, as it would seem 
> >> amazing that they had re-jigged for aubio 0.4.0 in three days,
> >> they list
> >> 
> >> aubio      0.3.2   http://aubio.org/pub/
> >> 
> >> as a dependency. So I really do not understand what is going on. 
> >> The aubio website indicates that all the new API has been under 
> >> wraps before Dec 17th.
> >> 
> >> Richard
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel 
> >>> mailing list address@hidden 
> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel 
> >> mailing list address@hidden 
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> > 
> > 
> > 
>