Re: [Denemo-devel] make dist failing

[Richard Shann]

On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 12:41 -0400, Paul Brossier wrote:
> On 01/29/2014 11:17 AM, Richard Shann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 10:33 -0400, Paul Brossier wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> [...]
> > "waf" yielded no hits when I looked for a package to install on my
> > (Debian stable) distro. So I guessed I couldn't build the new aubio.
> > But this may just be my misunderstanding of what's involved.
> 
> for awkward reasons, waf is not packaged in debian anymore. but you
> don't need to install it, it is included in the aubio source tarball.
> you can just run './waf configure' from the top directory.

hmm, yes I thought it might be just a misunderstanding of mine. I would
only want to install it locally (as user not super user) though.

> 
> also, aubio 0.4.0 is already unstable in debian, so you could use
> 'apt-get source aubio' and 'sudo apt-get build-deps aubio'

that needs root permissions I guess...

> 
> http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/aubio
> 
> > Incidentally, I couldn't navigate to the aubio mailing list
> > https://lists.aubio.org/ (I got an "Untrusted Website" page, with no
> > way forward),
> 
> arg. the certificate is self-signed, but you should be able to ask your
> browser to proceed anyway.

Yes, that is what I expected - a Proceed Anyway, but there wasn't an
obvious route on - perhaps the Add Exception would have done it, but the
browser seemed very disapproving :) Is this just because of https
instead of http?

> 
> > hence the message I left on the announcement page.
> 
> sorry, where did you leave a message?

There is a place for feedback on the News -> announcement of 0.4.0 ->
view/add comments,  so I left the feedback there - it was just asking
for guidance on the upgrade path.

> 
> > Thanks for the prompt reply - glad to hear about the development.
> > It'll be interesting to see how the new code works with that demo of
> > the note onset detection https://vimeo.com/82292569)
> 
> wow, i'm downloading the video now (low bandwidth), but sounds great!
> 
> the performance of the onset detection should change only little. one
> important change is that the onset timestamps are not quantized to
> hop_size anymore, but given in samples.

The onset detection code in src/sourceaudio.c is just cloned from your
onset example (and, likewise, but several years earlier the pitch
detection in src/pitchrecog.c was cloned from your example code).

Richard