[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check
From: |
Jacob Godserv |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:01:38 -0400 |
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:49, Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden> wrote:
> There is a hash in the manifest for the volume files. It's a simple
> check that duplicity does to verify that the volume is not corrupt,
> SHA1, or MD5, is all we use at the moment.
If duplicity can indeed do this checking per-volume instead of
per-file (as verify appears to do), and it does essentially the same
thing has '<hash-bin> -c' just as fast, then this feature gets my
vote.
--
Jacob
"For then there will be great distress, unequaled
from the beginning of the world until now — and never
to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut
short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the
elect those days will be shortened."
Are you ready?
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, edgar . soldin, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Jacob Godserv, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, edgar . soldin, 2009/09/17
- Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Gabriel Ambuehl, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, edgar . soldin, 2009/09/17
- Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Gabriel Ambuehl, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, edgar . soldin, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, László Monda, 2009/09/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Simon Ruderich, 2009/09/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check,
Jacob Godserv <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/09/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Jacob Godserv, 2009/09/18
- Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Gabriel Ambuehl, 2009/09/19