[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check
|
From: |
Gabriel Ambuehl |
|
Subject: |
Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:41:37 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.28-15-generic; KDE/4.3.1; i686; ; ) |
On 17.9.09 address@hidden wrote:
> so does verifying, and it is still a useful command. And again, usually
> download is much faster than upload for the average duplicity user (just
> my impression from the list).
>
Yes but once you go about downloading the whole thing, verifying it against
actual files is essentially free anyway. So maybe some option to run a remote
gpg --verify "not quite as dumb" remote backup space is really all we'd need?
- [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, László Monda, 2009/09/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, edgar . soldin, 2009/09/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Jacob Godserv, 2009/09/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, László Monda, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, edgar . soldin, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Jacob Godserv, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, edgar . soldin, 2009/09/17
- Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check,
Gabriel Ambuehl <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, edgar . soldin, 2009/09/17
- Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Gabriel Ambuehl, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, edgar . soldin, 2009/09/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, László Monda, 2009/09/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Simon Ruderich, 2009/09/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Jacob Godserv, 2009/09/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/09/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Jacob Godserv, 2009/09/18
- Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check, Gabriel Ambuehl, 2009/09/19