Re: [Duplicity-talk] Integrity check

[Simon Ruderich]

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:37:24PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> It may not necessarily a slow rather than an expensive line.
>> Think non-flatrate
> The reason why I started thinking of it was ... Let's say I want to
> remove the incrementals of the last month and start with a fresh set
> of incrementals against my old full. Don't I want to make sure that
> this old full is still intact? So actually I think integrity checking
> is done seldom but needed in some cases.
>
> ... ede

Hi,

I also would like to see this as a command. As far as I know if
one incremental backups is damaged the whole backup may be lost.
So this would also be very useful for checking (older) backups.
And if it's simple to implement then even better.

Thanks,
Simon
-- 
+ privacy is necessary
+ using http://gnupg.org
+ public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature