[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --program-suffix
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: --program-suffix |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:50:55 -0700 (MST) |
Sorry for confusion, I made a mistake in the sentence you are quoting. The
question should be: Should this alternative name be GNUecams21-21.1.50 or
GNUecams-21.1.5021?
I think that a more reasonable transformation is to specify a suffix
like "-21" rather than just "21". That does work on when applied to
emacs-21.1.50. But I am not sure.
- Re: --program-suffix, (continued)
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/10
- Re: --program-suffix, Andreas Schwab, 2001/11/10
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/11
- Re: --program-suffix, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2001/11/11
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/11
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/12
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/12
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/12
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/13
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/13
- Re: --program-suffix,
Richard Stallman <=
Please help developing Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/11
Re: Please help developing Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/12
Re: Please help developing Emacs, Kevin A. Burton, 2001/11/12
Re: Please help developing Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/13
Re: Please help developing Emacs, Kevin A. Burton, 2001/11/14