Re: Change in process.c

[Nick Roberts]

 > > Can't the reason for the change be summarised in situ?
 > 
 > it is summarized: "or some reason, this sleep() prevents Emacs from 
 > sending loadavg to 5-8(!) for ~10 seconds".
 > 40 messages of various conjectures, claims, counterclaims, rebuttals &c 
 > are long but of dubious value inside the source code.

If we don't understand why a change works then I'm not sure that it's the
right fix.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob