[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug trackers
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Bug trackers |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:44:28 -0500 |
Debbugs currently is based on the assumption that every bug is
assigned to at least one package. In terms of a distribution, this
makes perfect sense, but it's different for applications. When you're
developing a single application like emacs, I'd imagine you'd separate
bugs into "components" or similar of the application, like "gtk
interface", "documentation", or "elisp" (as examples; you all'd come
up with better ones.)
Is it possible for all bugs to be initially assigned to "emacs"
and for maintainers to move them subsequently into other categories?
- Re: Bug trackers, (continued)
- Re: Bug trackers, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/18
- Re: Bug trackers, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/18
- Re: Bug trackers, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/18
- Re: Bug trackers, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/19
- Re: Bug trackers, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/19
- Re: Bug trackers, Karl Fogel, 2008/02/19
- Re: Bug trackers, Xavier Maillard, 2008/02/20
- Re: Bug trackers, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/21
- Re: Bug trackers, Xavier Maillard, 2008/02/22
- Re: Bug trackers, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/19
- Re: Bug trackers,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Bug trackers, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/20
- Re: Bug trackers, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/21
- Re: Bug trackers, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/26
- Re: Bug trackers, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/26
- Re: Bug trackers, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/26
- Re: Bug trackers, Don Armstrong, 2008/02/26
- Re: Bug trackers, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/26
- Re: Bug trackers, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/02/26
- Re: Bug trackers, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/27
- Re: Bug trackers, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/26