[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Key bindings proposal
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Key bindings proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:54:44 +0200 |
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:02, Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> My intention has not been to fork (though you seemed to believe that,
>> Juanma).
>
> No, I don't think that was your intention, though I think (and
> apparently I'm not the only one) that's what you've done. I dislike
> that, because it seems like a wasted effort. I'd rather see you
> working on standard Emacs. Seems unlikely.
I am working on the standard Emacs. Though that does not always pass
this list. (I want to keep the discussions to a minimum.)
- RE: Key bindings proposal, (continued)
- RE: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/02
- RE: Key bindings proposal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/02
- RE: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: Key bindings proposal, David Kastrup, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/03
- no forking relation (was: Key bindings proposal), Drew Adams, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/05