[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Key bindings proposal
From: |
Uday S Reddy |
Subject: |
Re: Key bindings proposal |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:39:17 +0100 |
Juanma Barranquero writes:
> That's one possible interpretation. I don't think it is necessary to
> fork Emacs to make it appealing to Windows users, for example.
> Improvements can be made, of course.
In that case, I would like to understand at least the key binding
aspects of this divergence. How do you think Lennart could have
changed the key bindings for the needs of W32 users? And, Lennart, if
you can follow up please.
Cheers,
Uday
- Re: Key bindings proposal, (continued)
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/03
- RE: Key bindings proposal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/02
- RE: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, David Kastrup, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/03
- no forking relation (was: Key bindings proposal), Drew Adams, 2010/08/03
- Re: Key bindings proposal,
Uday S Reddy <=
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/05