Re: CL package serious deficiencies

[Lennart Borgman]

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:23, Nix <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 7 Feb 2012, Lennart Borgman spake thusly:
>
>
> So as a result, if one of us wants to use `cadr' in ordinary Lisp
> functions that are part of Emacs, we can, but if we want to use `caddr',
> we can't. Now does that restriction make any sense at all? I'd say it

I am using caddr quite a lot. Without any whining byte-compiler or
other problems... ;-)