Re: CL package serious deficiencies

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "RMS" == Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

RMS> * CL is ugly.  It is not well integrated with the rest of Emacs Lisp.

The second part seems to me to be a circular argument.  It could be
better integrated; but it will not be as long as it is not acceptable.

RMS> * We would have to document the CL functions in the manual, which is a
RMS> big increase in the size.  It is not that that is totally intolerable,
RMS> it's that the benefit is not worth the burden.

Why does this consideration not apply to EIEIO?

Tom