Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function

[Helmut Eller]

On Sun, May 03 2015, Dmitry Gutov wrote:

> On 05/03/2015 09:54 AM, Helmut Eller wrote:
>
>> I was thinking of adding a new function like
>>
>>   (next-error-note-buffer BUFFER &optional DONT-SELECT)
>>
>> that essentially replaces next-error-last-buffer for those packages that
>> bother to use it AND to add some degree of backward compatibility by
>> recording the buffer returned by next-error-find-buffer.
>
> I'm not sure I understand your proposal. You seem to have ignored the
> description of the "non-ideal choice" number two.

Sorry, hadn't fully understood option two.  Yes, it option two probably
covers most cases that are relevant in practice.

Helmut