[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems
From: |
Pavel Kankovsky |
Subject: |
Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:27:37 +0100 (MET) |
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> What about using `ft2' instead of `freetype2', even in the FT library
> itself? So we would have
> #include <ft2/internal/...>
I am not sure ft2 is better than freetype2. In fact, the longer variant is
less prone to unintentional collisions with other software. But I agree
that some consistency would be desirable...even if it meant another major
reshuffling of files.
--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."
- [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, David Turner, 2000/11/09
- Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/09
- Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/09
- Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, David Turner, 2000/11/09
- Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/09
- Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, Ramiro Estrugo, 2000/11/12