Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > What about using `ft2' instead of `freetype2', even in the FT library
> > itself?  So we would have
> >   #include <ft2/internal/...>
> 
> I am not sure ft2 is better than freetype2.

It works nicely with the 8+3 file name restriction also.  Addionally,
it is easy to omit the `2' in `freetype2', which can cause weird
errors in case FT 1.3 has the same header file.


    Werner