[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag? |
Date: |
19 Sep 2003 13:52:20 +0900 |
Damien Elmes <address@hidden> writes:
> Well, if --setup on import was to be the default, the problem would
> go away .. :-) But I don't think Tom's with me on that one.
My favorit option is to change --setup's short option to be -S, since
--setup is much less commonly used (in the various tla commands) than
--summary...
-Miles
--
"Most attacks seem to take place at night, during a rainstorm, uphill,
where four map sheets join." -- Anon. British Officer in WW I
- [Gnu-arch-users] -L option for tag?, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?, Robert Collins, 2003/09/19