[Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?

[Robert Anderson]

On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 21:30, Miles Bader wrote:
> Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
> > Two of them take a -L, --log-message option.  tag doesn't.  It
> > should, shouldn't it?
> 
> I suppose, though it seems less likely that people will use it than
> with the others, as the automatic message is usually good enough.

For ordinary versions, I'd agree it's less likely (although probably
worth having anyway).  But what about "tag versions"?  I think it makes
all kinds of sense in that context.

Bob