Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>

    > BTW, is it alright to use `tag' to create _occasional_ tagged
    > versions in branch, e.g., base-0 = tag, patch-1 = patch, patch-2
    > = patch, patch-3 = tag, ...?  This seems convenient in some
    > cases, but I vaguely recall a warning against it somewhere.

If you grok patch-logs and their relation to whats-missing and the
merging commands, then you qualify for a license to tag in otherwise
simple development branched versions.  In the state of California
there is a small fee and a multiple-choice test -- I'm not sure how
they handle it in Japan.

However, I wonder if in 9/10 of your occaisional cases, you wouldn't
rather `get' the thing you would tag, `sync-tree' with the version you
want to commit to, then commit.

-t