Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: -L option for tag?

[Robert Anderson]

On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 21:59, Robert Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 21:30, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Robert Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
> > > Two of them take a -L, --log-message option.  tag doesn't.  It
> > > should, shouldn't it?
> > 
> > I suppose, though it seems less likely that people will use it than
> > with the others, as the automatic message is usually good enough.
> 
> For ordinary versions, I'd agree it's less likely (although probably
> worth having anyway).  But what about "tag versions"?  I think it makes
> all kinds of sense in that context.

BTW: I'm using "ordinary version" to mean a version that has a base-0
created with an import or tag command, and subsequent revisions created
with commit.

I'm using "tag version" to mean a version that has a base-0 and all
subsequent revisions created with a tag command.

Bob