gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?


From: Karel Gardas
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:13:37 +0200 (CEST)

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Pau Aliagas wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >
> > > How is it that such brilliantly clever guys such as Linus and Andrea
> > > seem *so* slow on the uptake when it comes to arch?  What am I
> > > missing?  It's not as if arch hasn't been mentioned many many times on
> > > lkml already ...
> >
> > Manner. They simply used to use BK and since it is running enough for
> > them, they forget to research to use any other technology. Don't forget:
> > there are a _lot_ of other open source version controls now...Maybe they
> > still think that Arch is just slow... and yes, I'm afraid BK is still
> > clear winner in term of performance when working on the large source trees
> > and yes, I agree that the gap bettwen BK and Arch is now more close thanks
> > to _excelent_ work done by Tom and you all others pushing your patches and
> > suggesting other ideas.
>
> Just wait a few weeks and see. Once a couple of linux developers switch to
> arch, help us in porting it to their favourite platforms and speed it a
> bit more, the rest will come after naturally.
>
> World domination is knocking our door :)

I also think so, since from what I have seen so far, I think Arch is the
best. :-))

It's just question of time...

Karel
--
Karel Gardas                  address@hidden
ObjectSecurity Ltd.           http://www.objectsecurity.com





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]