[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:53:47 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) XEmacs/21.5 (celery, linux) |
>>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Stephens <address@hidden> writes:
Bruce> Sheesh, if you're thinking about changing this, at least
Bruce> plan to do it the right way!
Andrea mentioned it: special file system. If the kernel hackers join,
that's quite feasible. Better yet, Jan Harkes is/was out there, which
means distributed file system expertise.
I don't think it's time to change this.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Adam Spiers, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Samium Gromoff, 2003/09/26
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Robin Farine, 2003/09/26
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: log-buf-len dynamic (fwd), Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/26