Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ANN: Linux Kernel Arch Repository

[John Goerzen]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:58:33PM -0400, Miles Bader wrote:
> Oh, wait, it has to use the new names when recreating the caches too; latest
> version or apply:

OK, it's close, but now I see:
* recreating cached revisions...
cacherev: invalid revision spec (linux-renamed/linux--linus--1.0--patch-1)
cacherev: invalid revision spec (linux-renamed/linux--linus--1.1--patch-1)
cacherev: invalid revision spec (linux-renamed/linux--linus--1.2--patch-1)
cacherev: invalid revision spec (linux-renamed/linux--linus--2.0--patch-1)
cacherev: invalid revision spec (linux-renamed/linux--linus--2.1--patch-133)
cacherev: invalid revision spec (linux-renamed/linux--linus--2.1--patch-46)
cacherev: invalid revision spec (linux-renamed/linux--linus--2.4--patch-19)
cacherev: invalid revision spec (linux-renamed/linux--linus--2.4--patch-28)
cacherev: invalid revision spec (linux-renamed/linux--linus--2.5--patch-35)
cacherev: invalid revision spec (linux-renamed/linux--linus--2.5--patch-76)
cacherev: invalid revision spec
(linux-renamed/linux--linus-pre--2.4--base-0)
cacherev: invalid revision spec
(linux-renamed/linux--linus-pre--2.4--patch-13)

I suspect that it is assuming that the path given for directory is a valid
and registered tla archive path, which is not necessarily the case.  No
biggie, though, and now I do have a nice list of revs that need caching.

Thanks for the hard work, Miles.

-- John