[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1? |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:58:24 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Robert Collins <address@hidden>
> On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 07:34, Tom Lord wrote:
> > I'm planning on making a release after finishing up the merge
> > with the integration branch.
> > It would be a slight change of plans, but one option is to=20
> > call that release "1.1".
> We're not quite there I think. There are a few hardlink related goodies
> in the bt system, that I'll get onto once we're synced again.
> With those in - yes, 1.1 would be great to finally 'hit'. (There are
> also a few logic errors we need to get fixes for - but they can be 1.1
> point releases IMO.
Ok, then.... perhaps the thing to do is to make another 1.1pre release
on a deadline basis: merge in a few more of the simple things tomorrow
morning, cut a pre-release after that, and then we can work out
the delta from there to 1.1.
-t