Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?

[Florian Weimer]

Tom Lord wrote:

> One of the main reasons to maybe make the 1.1 release now is the
> debian release process.  There have been a number of incidental
> comments on #irc that naming a release 1.1 will cause it to show up in
> debian-stable sooner, which apparently there is some demand for.

ITYM unstable.  This is just the package maintainer's decision; there is
nothing in Debian's rules which would prevent him from shipping a
devo--1.1 version.

I'm pretty agnostic about the 1.1 label, but unless the tutorial is
up-to-date, I don't think it would be a good idea from a PR point of
view.

> Any objections?  Factual corrections about the debian process?

The documentation question is not relevant for Debian at this point.