[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1? |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:42:22 +1100 |
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 08:14, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> Debian stable doesn't seem worth worrying about. Debian testing is a
> more practical target. Presumably other distributions would also be
> more keen to take something called 1.1.
the version # isn't the issue - the issue is that 1.1 isn't released yet
- it's still considered 'pre-release'.
> > Any objections? Factual corrections about the debian process?
>
> i don't see any mention of bug #5554/#5635, which is a big issue for
> people relying on implicit naming for many files. It also appears to
> have a relatively simple patch (in bug 5554).
I'll review this tonight.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part