Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?

[Bruce Stephens]

Robert Collins <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 08:14, Bruce Stephens wrote:
>> Debian stable doesn't seem worth worrying about.  Debian testing is a
>> more practical target.  Presumably other distributions would also be
>> more keen to take something called 1.1.
>
> the version # isn't the issue - the issue is that 1.1 isn't released yet
> - it's still considered 'pre-release'.
>
>> > Any objections?  Factual corrections about the debian process?
>> 
>> i don't see any mention of bug #5554/#5635, which is a big issue for
>> people relying on implicit naming for many files.  It also appears to
>> have a relatively simple patch (in bug 5554).
>
> I'll review this tonight.

It may be that you've already merged it---I just couldn't see it in
Tom's list, or in his tla--devo--1.1 branch.