[Gnu-arch-users] Re: how important is declaring 1.1?

[Pau Aliagas]

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Florian Weimer wrote:

> Tom Lord wrote:
> 
> > One of the main reasons to maybe make the 1.1 release now is the
> > debian release process.  There have been a number of incidental
> > comments on #irc that naming a release 1.1 will cause it to show up in
> > debian-stable sooner, which apparently there is some demand for.
> 
> ITYM unstable.  This is just the package maintainer's decision; there is
> nothing in Debian's rules which would prevent him from shipping a
> devo--1.1 version.
> 
> I'm pretty agnostic about the 1.1 label, but unless the tutorial is
> up-to-date, I don't think it would be a good idea from a PR point of
> view.

I'm also for polishing the tutorial with all the final additions before 
any PR. There are so many new features that it is a must to do it before 
it is impossible unless you rewritr it from scratch.

Pau