[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu
From: |
Angles Puglisi |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch) |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:07:26 -0500 |
I've made rpms of arch for a long time now, for my own use. tla arch is now
very easy to package for rpm, very standard, there is no issue with this. For
my own purposes I also made an rpm of the octopy GUI tool. These are a little
dated, but for my examples see:
www.dudex.net/rpms/tla-1.1.spec
www.dudex.net/rpms/tla-1.1-aap1.i686.rpm
www.dudex.net/rpms/tla-1.1-aap1.src.rpm
www.dudex.net/rpms/octopy.spec
www.dudex.net/rpms/octopy-20031204-2.noarch.rpm
www.dudex.net/rpms/octopy-20031204-2.src.rpm
Cameron Patrick (address@hidden) wrote:
>
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
> | The test releases of fedora core 2 include subversion. The largest barrier
> | to wider adoption of subversion has been the difficulty of installation.
> | This barrier is now gone.
>
> *shrug* Both tla and subversion have been in Debian sid for a while;
> I've never considered the difficulty of installation to be a problem
> with subversion. (I find its binary format much more scary than its
> dependency list!)
>
> | If any gnu arch advocates want to see a wider use of arch, I believe now is
> | the time to act.
>
> Arch should be really trivial to package. Pretty much all it needs
> is diff, patch and tar - presumably even Red Hat includes these - and
> the tla binary should be pretty much stand-alone. That said, I
> wouldn't have a clue about how to make an RPM of tla, or how to get
> one included with Fedora. Since I don't use Fedora, this doesn't
> bother me :-)
>
> Why don't /you/ act, if you care about tla in Fedora? Perhaps make
> your own rpm .spec file - I've seen ones for more complicated packages
> that fit entirely on one screen - and see if you can convince Red Hat
> to include your package.
>
> Cameron.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
>
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
>
>
--
That's "angle" as in geometry.
www.anglemail.org
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Brian May, 2004/02/26
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Miles Bader, 2004/02/26
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Miles Bader, 2004/02/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Cameron Patrick, 2004/02/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch),
Angles Puglisi <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Tom Lord, 2004/02/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Zenaan Harkness, 2004/02/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Colin Walters, 2004/02/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Tom Lord, 2004/02/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Colin Walters, 2004/02/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Miles Bader, 2004/02/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Colin Walters, 2004/02/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Miles Bader, 2004/02/22
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Zenaan Harkness, 2004/02/22
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fedora core 2 will include subversion (and not gnu arch), Robin Green, 2004/02/24