[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Jun 2004 16:04:02 -0400 |
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 15:22, Florian Weimer wrote:
> This is not a real barrier. AFAIK, SFTP exposes the whole file system
> without restrictions. This probably means that local vulnerabilities
> can well turn into remote ones.
Fine, so run a ssh server on a different port and have the sftp
subsystem be in a chroot.
> rssh probably doesn't support the SFTP subsystem (i.e. it's not
> possible to add further restrictions to the paths you can access).
That's correct.
> WebDAV could be an option, but there aren't any implementations which
> one could consider lightweight AFAIK.
And this translates into "tla doesn't support centralized development"?!
> Uh-oh. This needs a global view and thus is very hard to do.
But it's generally automatable.
> For GCC, this means that most patchlogs cannot be removed until the
> branch is officially dead (not only unmaintained, but really dead).
> Currently, GCC 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and of course HEAD are still in
> development. A sizable number of patch logs has to live for years.
It depends on the merge style. For example, if you use star-merge, then
I believe you only need to keep the most recent patch log. However for
missing/replay style merging - yes, you need to keep the whole history.
> But I'll lurk a bit on the Rhythmbox mailing list...
We don't actually discuss arch much there, becuase we haven't had any
problems with it really. But feel free to lurk :)
The archive is here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/rhythmbox-devel/
But searching is broken at the moment.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some issues, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Colin Walters, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Colin Walters, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Colin Walters, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 2004/06/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 2004/06/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues,
Colin Walters <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthew Palmer, 2004/06/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 2004/06/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Michael Poole, 2004/06/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 2004/06/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Miles Bader, 2004/06/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 2004/06/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 2004/06/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 2004/06/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 2004/06/15
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 2004/06/15