[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla changes vs. baz status

[Matthieu Moy]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Adrian Irving-Beer <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Doesn't baz support "changes" anyway?
>>
>> Just a deprecated alias for 'status'.
>
> That's kind of stupid -- they do different things.

I think "changes" should have been an alias for "diff", actually.

> the last time I tried it, "baz status" had other random crap tacked
> on as well (and mucked up the standard part a bit too for no
> apparent reason).

Could you detail a bit more on that point?

I've cleaned up the output a little for baz 1.5 (conflicts displayed
like other files), what more would you expect?

-- 
Matthieu