[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Should "baz diff" provide a summary at the beginning? (Re: tla changes vs. baz status)

[Miles Bader]

Matthieu Moy <address@hidden> writes:
> I propose
>
>  baz diff => display the summary + the full diff
>  baz diff --summary => display the summary only
>  baz diff --no-summary => display only the full diff

That sounds OK to me; then the two could be exactly the same except that
"changes" would default to --summary, and could be implemented as a
wrapper command around "diff" (by adding "--summary" to the args unless
--diffs was specified).

-Miles
-- 
Fast, small, soon; pick any 2.