[Gnu-arch-users] Should "baz diff" provide a summary at the beginning? (Re: tla changes vs. baz status)

[Matthieu Moy]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

>> I think "changes" should have been an alias for "diff", actually.
>
> No.  It should just do what tla changes does.  Not only is that
> compatible, but it's useful functionality as well.

Then, I would rephrase my sentence as

  I think "changes" should have been an alias for "diff", and diff
  should display a summary like "tla changes".

;-).

I also missed this summary, and that's why Xtla rebuilds it from the
diff to show it to the user.

I propose

 baz diff => display the summary + the full diff
 baz diff --summary => display the summary only
 baz diff --no-summary => display only the full diff

What do other think?

-- 
Matthieu