Re: [Gomp-discuss] Architecture

[Lars Segerlund]

 Well the g95 community is not 'broken' into two groups, it's a minor 
split in which most people want's to get everything into the gcc source 
tree and to strictly adhere to gcc's coding conventions etc.

 Both groups are fixing and working on the same code so it's basicly 
the same project.

Biagio Lucini wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
>
>
> > Should we coordinate with the g95 people? That projects has, unfortunately,
> > broken into two groups now... one group is pushing for integration with gcc
> > mainline, so I'll ask on their lists about their plans.
>
>
> Yes, we can. Probably it makes more sense to use g95 rather than g77 for
> the fortran directives.
>
> Meanwhile, I have started looking at the open64 implementation. I thought
> that I could join their developper list and ask what is the state of
> OpenMp on that compiler, just to get some inspiration (if needed).
>
> I also remind you that apart from the directives we need to sort out also
> the library, and probably this is some piece of work that could be share
> with people working on other compilers.
>
>
> Biagio
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss