gomp-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gomp-discuss] Architecture


From: Biagio Lucini
Subject: Re: [Gomp-discuss] Architecture
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:58:13 +0000 (GMT)

Hi Lars - Since you seem the most active so far, would you mind to write
down a preliminary architecture specification document that can serve as a
starting point for further discussions? Don't worry if there are still a
few question marks, just underline where they are.

Thanks
Biagio

On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:

> 
>   If you have a look at treelang in the tree-ssa branch you can see that 
> tree generation is quite simple, so we might even start off without a 
> frontend, but only a stub which feeds 'specific' tree's to the backend.
>   Thus the backend could be completed before the frontend work, and then 
> the handling of the omp directives would be simplified to the insertion 
> of a single tree node in the frontends.
> 
>   This way, a certain 'independence' of the threading model would be 
> reached ( actually it would be had for free :-) ).
> 
>   So the question is, what needs to be specified and what is unknown ?
> 
>   / Lars
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]