[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test
From: |
Joshua N Pritikin |
Subject: |
RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:17:46 +0530 |
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 01:00 -0600, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> Darn, I think I am stuck in power outage time again. I guess 12pm IST is
> 12am CST perhaps?
>
> Well, I think it is most efficient if I reply to your msgs when I have had
> a chance to e.g. try the levels once the power it back on. My day is
> chock full tomorrow so alas it will have to wait until Thurs. Ug.
Gosh, feedback within 2 or 3 days? I'm acclimated to waiting 1-2 months
to hear back from you. ;-)
> Also, when I messed around with it yesterday I could not make any sense of
> what the stats meant. E.g. N did not seem to correspond to the number of
> replies I had done and M did not seem to be a mean and S (or I forget what
> the letter or abbrev was) did not seem to correspond to an sdev. Perhaps
> this is just one of those buggy things you have not gotten around to
> fixing yet.
No, you guessed correctly. I am using the abbreviations according the
APA Publication Manual. What perhaps isn't obvious is that the samples
include everyone who has rated the particular construal, not just you.
> Anyway, I spoke to Peter and he is not too concerned with total and
> complete alignment with CLib.
>
> I think the main task facing me is to come up with a set of test cases
> that go beyond the dissertation. E.g. Tracy wants a banana. Tracy gets a
> banana/apple/strawberry/piece of coal. Then modify the model to handle
> them all.
OK
> Another task might be to simply get you all the surveys from the
> dissertation. Ug. This has been on the list forever.
Why? I believe you already sent me one survey. I diligently copied
everything for OHL v1. For OHL v2, there are a few changes:
1. There are a few minor changes in wording.
2. The reason and the emotion are rated separately, not together. Why?
Because I believe the emotion is dependent on the reason. Hence, if the
reason is unbelievable then there is no point in rating the emotion.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, (continued)
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, Josh White, 2005/03/22
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/03/22
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/22
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/03/22
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/03/22
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/23
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/23
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test,
Joshua N Pritikin <=
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/26
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/22