[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test
From: |
Joshua N Pritikin |
Subject: |
RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:54:28 +0530 |
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 10:34 -0600, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> One basic reaction...I really think we should go back to the old paradigm
> of...
>
> Goal: e.g. Tracy wants an Apple.
>
> Situation: e.g. Tracy gets a banana.
>
> Feeling: e.g. Tracy feels happy.
>
> Explanation: e.g. Because she got attention from mommy.
>
> Please rate the believability of the Feeling and the Explanation taken
> together on a scale of 1 - 5.
If you want to put your blinders on and march forward with the old
paradigm then simply ignore everything below level 'm'.
Everything is essentially the same.
> ...also, if we are to prove hypotheses scientifically, there should
> be reversed items in there (i.e. cases in which the feeling is opposite).
How items are reversed is the same as your dissertation.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, (continued)
- Re: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/21
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, Josh White, 2005/03/22
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/03/22
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/22
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test,
Joshua N Pritikin <=
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/03/22
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/23
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/23
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, Joshua N Pritikin, 2005/03/23
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/26
- RE: [Heartlogic-dev] OHL v2 alpha test, William L. Jarrold, 2005/03/22