Re: Problems with spanish update (Re: My patch to music glossary)

[Graham Percival]

On 30-May-06, at 8:35 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:

> El mar, 30 de may de 2006, a las 12:33:42 -0700, Graham Percival dijo:
>
> > I've made the changes that I could; could you make a second patch
> > against current CVS?  I'll ask somebody else to process that patch.
>
> There is something VERY wrong at current CVS version; I suspect that
> my patch (or a part o it) has not been properly applied as I see now
> FOUR latin characters instead of TWO for each UTF-8 accented
> character. Viewing it as UTF-8 still appear as TWO (ugly) characters
> each.

You know more about this than I.  If you want, I could revert CVS to 
the previous version and we could try this entire thing again.  (or 
rather, you could try it with somebody else doing the patch)

> It seems that something (perhaps CVS system or the Patch command
> themselves) have been confused somewhere.
>
> Also, after a '$ cvs co' my local copy has strange '<<<<<<'- and
> '>>>>>'-filled lines surrounding some of my changes, don't know if
> they have been applied or not. So I really don't know how to obtain a
> second patch from this.

I only made changes which applied cleanly, so updating your local copy 
shouldn't produce anything like that.  Try moving your copy of 
music-glossary.tely to another file name (bak-*), doing a cvs update to 
get the new version, than do a diff on your local machine.

> BTW at present time TeXinfo absolutely does not support other
> languages than English, why was it used for a int'l glossary like
> this?

I don't know; it was made before I started doing doc stuff.  It appears 
to produce good output in most cases.

>  Remember that other PDF docs than glossary are still broken.

Huh?  What's this?

Cheers,
- Graham