[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: KeyboardStaff?
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: KeyboardStaff? |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 20:45:58 +0200 |
2008/10/8 Joe Neeman <address@hidden>:
> Is keeping one extra context definition around such a learning barrier?
Certainly not; it's just a matter of consistency in LilyPond syntax.
> PianoStaff could be useful in the future: if I ever get around to fixing
> the vertical spacing (ok, let's be more optimistic: when I get around to
> fixing the vertical spacing) then PianoStaff could have presets to make,
> for example, centred dynamics easier. Basically, I'm in favour of
> keeping high-level semantic distinctions around in case they turn out to
> be useful.
Oh, I never suspected that the current GrandStaff-like PianoStaff was
meant to be temporary. As Graham said, this closes the discussion; if
I may, I can't wait to see the nice features you mention implemented
:-)
Cheers,
Valentin
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, (continued)
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/06
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Mark Polesky, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, David Kastrup, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Graham Percival, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?, Graham Percival, 2008/10/08
Re: KeyboardStaff?, Joe Neeman, 2008/10/08
- Re: KeyboardStaff?,
Valentin Villenave <=