[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git repository with fixed history ready
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: git repository with fixed history ready |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:52:32 +0100 |
2010/3/23 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 09:18:40AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> There's one small problem with replacing the old repository,
>> *all* committishes change, and everyone will have to make
>> a fresh clone, and any work based on the old repository
>> must be copied over to the new clone using git format-patch
>> and git am.
>
> Could somebody translate for the git-impaired?
>
> - if I have no non-pushed commits, do I need to do anything?
>
> - does anything need to happen to branches like dev/waf ? (again,
> assuming that we have pushed everything)
>
> - if we tell new contributors to remove their lilypond-git dirs
> before the changeover, then tell them to run lily-git after the
> changeover, will it work?
No, no, yes. Anyway, recall that git is robust enough as to face a
complete crash of savannah with no backups.
In Git we trust,
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
Re: git repository with fixed history ready, Graham Percival, 2010/03/22
Re: git repository with fixed history ready, John Mandereau, 2010/03/23