[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git repository with fixed history ready
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: git repository with fixed history ready |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:05:25 +0100 |
Op dinsdag 23-03-2010 om 18:40 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef Graham
Percival:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:05:51AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> > Il giorno mar, 23/03/2010 alle 01.49 +0000, Graham Percival ha scritto
> > > - does anything need to happen to branches like dev/waf ? (again,
> > > assuming that we have pushed everything)
> >
> > Yes, they will have to be rebased on top of the rewritten history.
>
> Who's volunteering to do this? I guess we should do this for all
> branches, including almost-certainly-abandoned ones like
> dev/rlittle with initial work on braille output.
All branches are present (rewritten and rebased) in the new
repository, as you can see. Please do a quick check if
what you need is there.
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
AvatarĀ®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl | http://lilypond.org
- Re: git repository with fixed history ready, (continued)
Re: git repository with fixed history ready, Graham Percival, 2010/03/22
Re: git repository with fixed history ready, John Mandereau, 2010/03/23